Page 2 of 2

Re: A kind of microphone

PostPosted: Tue Jun 18, 2019 6:32 pm
by Doug Coulter
Sorry Rex, we old pharts who have been in the audio biz can run indefinitely and maybe not quite on the original topic, either....quite.

Those specs make it look like a good mic for many uses, and it's indeed cute - which matter to some.
The key statement to me was "good about feedback" which indicates two things (maybe). The patern's not bad - OK, and that frequency response they plot isn't super-smoothed quite as much as most are.
Those who do live PA work are real sensitive to good pattern (also for rejecting room reverb, usually) but a "smooth" curve - doesn't have to be "flat" and these aren't, no biggie, actually. In real life, even in perfect anechoic chambers, most transducers may average out fairly flat on a 1/3 or 1/2 octave smoothed curve (which is what's usually published), but in reality have 10 or even 20 db peaks or dips hidden by that smoothing - and those result in horrible live performance as PA mics, as it's the gain at that little peak and bingo - feedback, even when the rest of the range can barely be heard.

This is in fact the reason I told the story about measuring impulse response, as it's a fast way to show that up along with an FFT.

Re: A kind of microphone

PostPosted: Wed Jun 19, 2019 8:30 pm
by Rex Allers
Oh, I have no problem with the discussion expanding. I found it interesting.

I just thought I would add a little more that I found about the capsules in their data sheets. The data sheets weren't an obvious click on their web pages.