Having become disgusted with other ion sources (Yes, I realize I'm starting to use that phrase a lot; it's what makes me invent better things), we searched all the literature for a better approach, one that would solve some of the troubles we experienced with other designs. These troubles included sputtering of the electrodes onto nearby insulators, difficult control of parameters, narrow gas pressure operating ranges, lack of good controllablity, and just general mechanical flakeyness and low reliability. We finally hit on a design described in a Rev Sci Ins paper, (RevSciInstru 36, 294-298 Microwave discharge cavities, Fehsenfeld, Evenson and Broida) and then improved considerably on that as a starting point. The source described here is the result of that process, and when we need another source, this one is what we will build more of. Nothing else has even come close here, though we have not yet tried the one proposed by Andrew Seltzman here yet, and may try that too if we ever need more ions than this gives (unlikely) or don't care about getting a high fraction of monatomic vs diatomic ions (also unlikely). Due to the advances in technology since then and the somewhat different demands a fusor makes on an ion source, we were able to improve on the design in the paper quite a bit, and build it very inexpensively. There is also a disscusion on this ion source here. There may be some details here that aren't there or vice versa.
![]() The net result is that this is more efficient, works over a broader range of pressure, and is more controllable than the original design by far. It is also pretty cheap to build yourself. Most of the "exotic" parts are from a dumpster, the rest are mainly from the local hardware store or McMaster-Carr. The single hard to make part is the cap threaded for the tuning screw, the rest is all hand tool turf. Even the cap could be replaced by a copper pipe cap with a nut brazed on if you wanted to go the hand tool route fully. It's just that I do have a machine shop here, so I take that into account when a few seconds on a real tool may save an hour of hand work with a file. In this case the machined end cap also has some electrical advantages over the pipe cap and brazed nut approach, as where the tuning screw joins the cap is the high current node in the resonant cavity, and a good solid ground is very important there to avoid losses and heating. Before we start discussing the individual parts and how to make them, let's do an overview of what we are trying to make, which the above picture is ideal for. This design involves coercing a normal microwave oven magnetron into operating in continuous (CW) mode, rather than the pulse mode it was designed for, which can sometimes be a trick to accomplish. Fortunately, we only need a couple of tens of watts out of it to do the job, so it is possible without getting into some failure mechanisms magnetrons have in CW mode. In the picture above the tube itself is cut off at the lower left. The pipe adapter and pipe coming diagonally up from that corner are the adapter and transmision line for the RF to the cavity. You can see it enter the cavity more tangential than normal, a feature of the original design that we didn't change -- it works well. One modification we made on the original was the variable length of the hardline -- that is what the pipe clamp accomplishes. We found that trying to tune the coupling screw at the end through a hole in the cavity as in the original was very problematic -- anything we used to poke in there affected the tuning badly, and some lossy dielectric tweakers just burn up quick. As it turns out, tuning this aspect is pretty non critical anyway, and once set hasn't needed to be changed. Moving up to the cavity proper, we have a piece of 1" ID copper plumbing pipe for this. The top is the special end cap used to hold the 1/4 wave stub which is threaded for tuning. At the other end is used a standard pipe cap that is cut down shorter, and notched (along with the 1" tubing) to allow the quartz pipe to pass through the cavity at the high voltage node end. To provide the roughly 980 Gauss magnetic field needed for electron cyclotron resonance, we built an adjustable magnet/yoke structure that is also threaded by the discharge tube. We bought a hall effect magnetometer to adjust the magnet spacing to get roughly the correct field for electrons to resonate with the 2.45 GHz output of the magnetron. Barely visible at the lower right is the cappilary tube we let gas into the system though, which also servers as the pusher electrode part of the ion extraction system. Not visible in this picture is the other electrode, which is inside the main vaccum tank, slid into that end of the quartz tube. Adding this and the magnetic field turned out to be very major improvements to the design, allowing use of less microwave power, longer gas pressure operating range, and some very nice control over the ion injection rate into the system. |
![]() When this picture was taken, I had not yet drilled and tapped the cavity top and cap at the bottom for 4-40 screws to hold it together, and frankly, look cool too. They weren't needed, but do serve to hold the thing together in real field use so things can't shift and require re tuning. And this cavity is high enough electrical Q that tuning is important here -- once you find the spot, the useful range is perhaps a 45 degree rotation of the 1/4-20 screw, which we put a spring under the head of so it would be stable. It works, and we've very rarely touched any adjustment in hundreds of hours of runtime. This Just Works. If there's any black magic here, you can't see it in any picture I have just now. It is in adapting from what was supposed to be an antenna to feed a piece of hardline coax. There actually wasn't much to it, though (leaving the theory aside for now). I brazed a pipe size adapter into a piece of common sheet metal you see bolted to the magnetron here. The adapter sticks down into the ground gasket about 1/8" or so, with the spring in the sheet metal holding it tight against the magnetron. Next, a washer was brazed on the end of the center conductor, which here is a piece of 1/8" Cu pipe. This in turn was soldered using some special flux for stainless steel we got at McMaster, to the end of the tube "antenna". The net result is a transmission line to the cavity that is roughly 3/4 wavelength, which is electrically the same as a 1/4 wave line would be for RF impedance matching purposes. The outer conductor is a piece of 1/2" Cu tubing, which needed a bushing to fit tight into the pipe adapter, which was slit on a saw and clamped with the hose clamp as seen. Note, for whatever reason, when you say "pipe" the assumed dimension is ID, but for "tubing" the assumed dimension is OD, and here I'm just perpetuating that strange nomenclature, which is industry standard for whatever reason. For reference, the coupling adjustment worked out such that the center conductor of the hardline is just about flush with the edge of the cavity. In the case of this one, it's a 4-40 screw threaded into the end of the 1/8" tubing that has been rounded off so no sharp edges to start arcing. It's not critical, and anything plus or minus something over 1/6" inch is fine here in this lashup anyway. YMMV when using a dumpster magnetron or one of a different basic power level. I very much reccomend using the lowest power magnetron you can find for this -- you just don't need even what that can put out, and they are somewhat difficult to "throttle" as well as could be desired. There is kind of some hysterisis in this, the bigger tubes have a higher mimimum power they will work at, and even this is borderline too much with a 600w rated magnetron. |
![]() The net inside cavity length is the key dimension to get to, however you do that. It is not extremely critical, however. The idea is to make it as short as you can and still have the 1/2" quartz tubing clear the tuning stub end. Here that worked out pretty close to 1.75" internal length. The idea is to have the highest possible E field per cm right where the gas tube is, so a closer fit means more field on the gas to ionize it for the same power, between the end of the rod and the end of the cavity. As we can easily have too much power here, this isn't critical at all unless the cavity volage gets so high that arcing occurs. We only had that problem with pyrex tubing, never with the quartz we now use. Although a 1.5" cavity length would do this in theory, what we have here is just fine, and it's nice to have a little slop for fitting things and so on. It's hard to have the quartz tube flush against the flat part of the pipe cap for example, partly because there isn't any truly flat part on the ones I got at the hardware store. No need for hyper-precision at this spot, luckily. |
![]() The ion extraction power comes from a 12 volt input, 1000v output CCFL inverter I get from DigiKey. This particular one is designed to drive two CCFL tubes, and is capacitively coupled on the output, very simple and cheap. I use the two caps as the series caps in two opposite polarity voltage doublers and get about plus and minus 3kv out of it with full input. To vary this I used an LM 317 regulator in a circuit with a pot to adjust the input volts to the inverter. The only downside of that is that below a certain input the inverter won't run and it jumps from zero output to about plus/minus 300v when it starts. Just now that's a problem for me as I'm doing something for which the amount of ions at 300v is too much, and at zero not quite enough, so I will improve that part soon. The part number for the one I'm using is 289-1025-ND at digikey, the manuf part number is BXA-12529. Note, grab these while you can, the advances in the tech are such that these are becoming scarce. All the new types are pwm for brightness control and will not work with simply varying the input voltage. And with PWM the output voltage peak is always the same as seen by a simple rectifier/filter combo. So, the new ones cost more and don't work as well for this. I get them 10 at a time, as they are also the cool thing for detector power supplies, and other low power things at medium high voltages. Very easy to get low noise DC out of them as they switch at about 60khz, so not much capacitor is needed. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
I do need to add some words about dreaded evil magic, otherwise known as mode hopping in the magnetron. Commerical oven units in general will hae 8 resonators in them, and in real life, they won't all be tuned precisely the same. Combine that with the fact that some will have higher Q than others, and in various circumstances one or a group will determine the precise oscillation frequency, then another at some slightly different frequency. Our cavity adds a ninth resonator. Mostly and surely when the gas isn't lit, it's the highest Q one of them all, and if it's tightly coupled to the tube, it will take over and control the oscillation frequency pretty well. But if that is marginal, you may see the magnetron go in and out of oscillation at our cavity frequency -- it will still be drawing current off its HV supply but the gas won't light off because the high Q of the cavity rejects frequencies it's not tuned to pretty well. In an extreme case, you may have a problem tube and just have to try another, but that hasn't happened here so far, we can always (so far) find a tuning and coupling combo that makes everything happy together, and now we only see any evidence of mode hopping when we put too much power into the magnetron, so one of the oddball tuned resonators in there can become dominant. So, word to the wise, look for the effect and decide what to do about it, likely you'll not notice, tune for max light, and that will be it.
And that's it, feel free to contact us if you have questions on this one, it's worthing doing and doing right, no other source we've used comes close to how well this one works. Due to not needed metal electrodes anywhere there is current, there is no sputtering, the quartz tube stays clean and pretty cool, It Just Works, now on to the next problem, and hope it's solved this well and this easily!
In case you were wondering, we get our quartz from National Scientific Company and they are good people to deal with. As usual, you do better buying in quantity, and in standard sizes. For this and some other things we got 1/2" tubing, fairly thin wall, one of the standard sizes they stock. Good stuff, and you can cut it on a lathe with a diamond wheel in the tool post grinder. This, and quartz in general, is not something you can just score and break -- you don't get a cut at all, it shatters instead. I guess with all this glass and quartz working going on I ought to make a page for the tools we made to do that with ease. When I get around to that. More fun to do than take pictures and type about to be sure!
Here's how to contact us: